Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Independent commentary

CPS January 2026 decision — walkthrough

Walkthrough of the Crown Prosecution Service's 20 January 2026 announcement that it would not pursue eleven additional charges relating to nine further babies, on the stated basis that 'the evidential test was not met.' The commentator analyses the significance: the same investigative methodology that produced the original convictions did not, when applied to additional candidate cases, clear the evidential threshold for prosecution. The piece notes the institutional context — three former Trust executives remain under separate gross-negligence-manslaughter investigation following their July 2025 arrests — and frames the decision as evidentially significant for any CCRC review of the existing convictions, since it constitutes the prosecuting authority's own assessment of where the methodology breaks down.

Last updated
2 min read
cps-decision
ccrc
investigative-methodology
trust-executives

Author / source

Independent YouTube commentator.

Summary paraphrased; quotes extracted under fair-dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). If you are the creator and wish attribution adjusted, please use the contact page.

YouTube URL pending; extract sourced from publicly circulated transcript of the video.