Primary sources
Documents library
Every primary-source document linked in one searchable place: Thirlwall Inquiry evidence, the Shoo Lee Expert Panel report, court judgments, sentencing remarks, the RCPCH review, statistical and scientific analyses, and long-form journalism. Where a document is hosted by another case-focused site, we credit them — their archives are part of why this site can exist. The two book-length treatments of the case are listed here too, but they are paid books rather than free documents; they are catalogued in full, with ISBNs and reviews, at books about the case.
Showing 25 of 25 documents
- Open
The 14-member international neonatologist panel's case-by-case medical review concluding there is no medical evidence of deliberate harm in any of the cases for which Letby was convicted.
Dr Shoo K. Lee and 13 co-authors · 3 February 2025 · hosted by lucyletbyinnocence.com
- Open
Follow-on Panel report covering ten further cases beyond the February 2025 summary. Conclusions consistent with the first report: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.
Dr Shoo K. Lee and International Expert Panel · 2025 · hosted by lucyletbyinnocence.com
- Open
Joint expert report specifically addressing the insulin evidence in the cases of Babies F and L: assay validation scope, confirmatory-testing absence, sample-handling failures, and the implications for whether the result can support a criminal finding.
Independent endocrinologists and clinical biochemists (Panel) · 2025 · hosted by lucyletbyinnocence.com
- Open
The authoritative record of the institutional response — witness statements from consultants, executives, nurses, regulators and NHS bodies.
Thirlwall Inquiry Secretariat · 2024–ongoing · hosted by thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk
- Open
The first public statement by a former UK Supreme Court Justice questioning the safety of the Lucy Letby convictions. Lord Sumption's op-ed specifically addresses the statistical-evidence architecture of the prosecution case — including the shift-chart selection-effect problem and the absence of independent statistical review — and applies the Cannings principle (that convictions should not rest on medical expert opinion alone where there is a credible alternative natural explanation) to the Letby case. Represents the highest-profile judicial intervention on conviction safety to date.
Lord Sumption (former UK Supreme Court Justice) · November 2025 · hosted by The Spectator
- Open
Anonymous 150-page report on how Operation Hummingbird (Cheshire Police's Letby investigation) took shape from its May 2017 opening. Argues the investigation was Letby-focused from day one, the mortality rate was misrepresented to police, and non-person causes of the cluster were not systematically considered.
Anonymous whistleblower · December 2025 · hosted by lucyletby.org
- Open
triedbystats.com — visual critique of the shift chart
Interactive siteFocused statistics mini-site with visual breakdowns of the shift chart and the base-rate and selection-effect problems.
triedbystats.com contributors · 2024–ongoing · hosted by triedbystats.com
- Open
science4justice.nl — scientific critique archive
Article archiveScientific summaries and critiques of the medical claims (insulin, air embolism, clinical deterioration). Primary scientific clearing-house on the case.
Science for Justice (Netherlands) · 2023–ongoing · hosted by science4justice.nl
- Open
lucyletbyinnocence.com — raw trial and inquiry archive
Full-text archiveLarge volunteer-maintained archive of full trial transcripts, Thirlwall transcripts, police interviews and per-baby evidence breakdowns. The most complete third-party document repository.
lucyletbyinnocence.com contributors · 2023–ongoing · hosted by lucyletbyinnocence.com
- Open
Long-form articles, statistical deep-dives and whistleblower reports.
lucyletby.org contributors · 2023–ongoing · hosted by lucyletby.org
- Open
free-lucy.com — news hub
Blog / newsNews-style updates and commentary, including David Davis MP's interventions.
free-lucy.com contributors · 2023–ongoing · hosted by free-lucy.com
- Open
Collective intervention by senior members of the criminal Bar — including senior Queen's Counsel and legal academics — on the expert-evidence standards raised by the Lucy Letby case. The letter addresses the use of expert witnesses in neonatal-death prosecutions, the absence of independent statistical review, and the structural lessons for the criminal-justice system. Signed by senior criminal silks and legal academics, it represents the first collective Bar-level public statement on the conviction-safety question.
Senior criminal silks and legal academics (Bar Council signatories) · April 2025 · hosted by The Times (publisher site — no public deep link verified)
- Open
The second book-length treatment of the case and the first to argue at length that the convictions are unsafe. 461 pages; paperback ISBN 9781917447492, hardback ISBN 9781917447485. The publisher describes it as examining the author's belief that the guilty verdict is not beyond reasonable doubt, covering the science relied on to explain the deaths, the weight placed on circumstantial evidence, and the interpretation of the statistics. The Justice Gap reports it draws on interviews with more than sixty experts conducted over three years, plus Thirlwall Inquiry documents and trial transcripts. Catalogued in full, alongside Coffey and Moritz's 2024 account, at /books.
Christopher Morris · 9 July 2026 · hosted by Cinto Press / Bath Publishing (publisher's page — paid book, not a free document)
- Open
The account by the BBC journalists behind the Panorama coverage of the case; Judith Moritz attended the trial throughout. Hardback ISBN 9781399625166 (2024), paperback ISBN 9781399625180 (2025). The publisher describes it as drawing on extensive interviews with people who knew and worked with Letby together with access to sources and documents, and frames it as ending on the open question of guilt or innocence. Its insulin chapter has been rebutted in detail in the commentary library. Catalogued at /books.
Jonathan Coffey and Judith Moritz · 24 October 2024 · hosted by Headline / Hachette UK (publisher's page — paid book, not a free document)
- Open
Lee & Tanswell (1989) — Air embolism in newborn infants
Academic paperThe original paper on neonatal air embolism cited by the prosecution. Dr Lee has publicly stated the paper was misapplied in the Letby trial.
S.K. Lee, A. Tanswell · 1989 · hosted by Archives of Disease in Childhood (BMJ)
- Open
Day-by-day inquiry hearing transcripts.
Thirlwall Inquiry Secretariat · September 2024–ongoing · hosted by thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk
- Open
The review commissioned by Trust executives instead of involving police; focused on unit configuration rather than the individual cases.
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health · November 2016 · hosted by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
- Open
Court of Appeal refusal of leave to appeal the original convictions, pre-dating the Shoo Lee Panel and most post-conviction expert reports.
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) · 24 May 2024 · hosted by Judiciary of England and Wales
- Open
The whole-life order sentencing remarks from the original trial.
Mr Justice Goss · 21 August 2023 · hosted by Judiciary of England and Wales
- Open
Sentencing for the Child K attempted-murder conviction at retrial.
Mr Justice Goss · 5 July 2024 · hosted by Judiciary of England and Wales
- Open
Royal Statistical Society — commentary on the shift-rota chart
Commentary / papersPublic-facing commentary on the 'Texas sharpshooter' statistical problems with the shift chart shown to the jury.
Royal Statistical Society · 2023–2024 · hosted by Royal Statistical Society
- Open
Prof. Richard Gill — case analysis and open letter
Personal web archiveDetailed statistical critique from the emeritus professor instrumental in the Lucia de Berk exoneration.
Prof. Richard Gill (Leiden) · 2023–ongoing · hosted by Leiden University
- Open
Rachel Aviv — The New Yorker (May 2024)
Magazine articleSingle most detailed long-form international investigation. Geo-blocked in the UK during the Child K retrial.
Rachel Aviv · 13 May 2024 · hosted by The New Yorker
- Open
Private Eye — M.D. column rolling coverage
Magazine columnRolling medical and investigative commentary. Among the earliest UK outlets to raise detailed expert-evidence doubts.
Dr Phil Hammond ('M.D.') · 2023–ongoing · hosted by Private Eye
- Open
Hansard — Sir David Davis MP adjournment debate
Hansard recordThe first Commons debate to publicly question the safety of the convictions.
UK Parliament · November 2024 · hosted by UK Parliament