Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts

Six concrete actions

How to help

The CCRC’s review, and the Thirlwall Inquiry’s final report, happen with or without public attention — but they happen faster, and more independently, when attention is sustained. Here is the priority order.

Petition · Change.org

Refer Lucy Letby’s case back to the Court of Appeal

The petition is the single most measurable action a reader can take. Signature count is reported in broadsheet coverage and tracked by the petition platform.

The Change.org page shows the live signature count and petition updates. Signing takes under a minute and is free.

1. Sign the Change.org petition

The petition calls for the case to be referred back to the Court of Appeal. It takes 30 seconds, it is free, and it is measurable — signature counts are reported in the media.

Sign on Change.org

2. Email your MP

Five minutes with a pre-filled letter that cites the Shoo Lee Panel and the CCRC application. MPs log the substance of constituent email. It is the single highest-leverage thing one person can do.

Open the MP email builder

3. Subscribe to updates

Lists grow. When the CCRC decides, or when the Thirlwall report publishes, we'll email you. You'll see the news in the same hour the journalists do.

See what you'll get

4. Share this site

Most people haven't seen the Panel's findings because the news cycle moved on. A single share to one friend who hasn't seen them is one more person on the right side of the evidence. Ready-to-post copy included.

Ready-to-post copy

5. Share the Panel report directly

The report is the single most persuasive document in this case. Send the PDF link directly to anyone debating the case on social media. It is more persuasive than anything we could write.

Link to the Panel report

6. Correct misinformation — with sources

When you see someone claim 'but she confessed' or 'but she was the only nurse present' in a thread, reply with the relevant evidence page on this site. Every primary claim is linked; you don't have to remember the citations.

Evidence problems, per issue