Reading paths
What are you trying to understand?
The site is large. Pick a path. Each path gives you a three-minute summary, a fifteen-minute route, a deep-dive route and the most-relevant primary documents. No accounts, no tracking, no personalisation — just a curated reading list.
I know nothing about the case
- ⚠️ Read the case-status banner before you read any of the analysis pages.
- ⚠️ Court findings, post-conviction expert claims and commentary are different things — this site labels them.
3-minute summary
- 1.Homepage — case status— Where the case stands today.
- 2.State of the evidence— Single best summary page.
- 3.What this site is not saying
15-minute route
Deep dive
Primary documents
I think she is guilty
- ⚠️ This path is written to be read in good faith. It does not ask you to change your view, only to see what is now being put before the CCRC.
3-minute summary
15-minute route
Deep dive
Primary documents
I think she may be innocent
- ⚠️ Don't overclaim. The convictions stand. No court or commission has yet ruled the convictions unsafe.
- ⚠️ Read the families-and-witnesses sensitivity policy before sharing or campaigning.
3-minute summary
15-minute route
Primary documents
I want the medical evidence
3-minute summary
15-minute route
Primary documents
I want the statistics
3-minute summary
15-minute route
Deep dive
Primary documents
I want the legal route
3-minute summary
15-minute route
Primary documents
I want the Thirlwall Inquiry
- ⚠️ The Thirlwall Inquiry is not a criminal appeal. It cannot overturn convictions; it examines the institutional response.
3-minute summary
15-minute route
Primary documents
I want documents and transcripts
3-minute summary
15-minute route
Deep dive
Primary documents
I want to help
- ⚠️ Read the sensitivity policy before contacting anyone connected to the case.
- ⚠️ Do not contact families, witnesses or jurors. Do not harass clinicians or hospital staff.
3-minute summary
15-minute route
Deep dive
Primary documents
Plain-English explainers
Short orientation pages on the medical, statistical, legal, media and institutional terms the case turns on. Each one points at the longer material rather than replacing it.