Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Independent commentary

Interview With Dr. Keith Wilkinson On Lucy Letby

Dr Keith Wilkinson, an anaesthetist with thirty years of practice on the Isle of Man, brings a perspective shaped by a longstanding interest in miscarriages of justice. He identifies several structural red flags: no witness ever observed Lucy Letby performing any harmful act; she had an exemplary three-year career before the allegations arose; she won an unprecedented employment grievance against senior consultants — a Band 5 nurse prevailing against consultants, which he argues is almost unheard of in the NHS. He also notes that Dr Evans self-presented to police rather than being commissioned independently, that Dr Bohin conducted his so-called peer review having been given Evans's conclusions first, and that the NCA's recommendation for a multidisciplinary expert panel — including a consultant obstetrician and a geneticist — was overridden. All of these factors, Wilkinson argues, should have been fatal to the prosecution before trial.

Last updated
2 min read

Notable extracts

Extracts transcribed from the linked video, quoted under fair dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). Source links are being restored: these extracts were transcribed from the videos but the per-video URLs and timestamps were not recorded, so they cannot yet be checked against the recording. Treat them as reported rather than verified, and see our corrections policy if you believe one is wrong.

Dr Keith Wilkinson

No one saw Lucy Letby do anything. Not one witness. In three years of working on that unit, not one person observed her performing any act that could have harmed a child. That is not a minor point — it is the foundational absence of direct evidence.
Topic: Interview With Dr. Keith Wilkinson On Lucy Letby

Dr Keith Wilkinson

Bohin was given Evans's reports and conclusions before he conducted his review. That is not peer review. That is endorsement. Those are completely different things, and the difference goes to the heart of the prosecution's scientific case.
Topic: Interview With Dr. Keith Wilkinson On Lucy Letby

Dr Keith Wilkinson

The NCA recommended a panel: consultant obstetrician, statistician, geneticist. That recommendation was ignored. One retired general paediatrician ran the entire investigation. How did that happen?
Topic: Interview With Dr. Keith Wilkinson On Lucy Letby
NCA-panel
peer-review
no-eyewitness
employment-grievance
investigation-failures
confirmation-bias

Author / source

Independent YouTube commentator.

Summary paraphrased; quotes extracted under fair-dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). If you are the creator and wish attribution adjusted, please use the contact page.

YouTube URL pending; extract sourced from publicly circulated transcript of the video.