Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Independent commentary

Interview With Investigator Dr. Steve Watts On Lucy Letby

Dr Steve Watts, a former Assistant Chief Constable with a doctorate in police investigations, delivers a forensic critique of Operation Hummingbird. He argues the investigation was driven by confirmation bias from the outset — police were pointed at Letby before independent analysis was conducted. He highlights that the National Crime Agency convened a review panel that advised caution, but that advice was not followed. He criticises the recruitment of Dr Dewi Evans, suggesting Evans had prior professional connections that compromised his independence, and describes this as an improper expert selection process. He also reveals that the Crown Prosecution Service actively instructed police not to engage Professor Jane Hutton for statistical analysis, describing this as a significant procedural failure. He draws comparisons with other flawed police investigations and argues that institutional pressure to secure a conviction replaced genuine inquiry.

Last updated
2 min read

Notable extracts

Extracts transcribed from the linked video, quoted under fair dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). Source links are being restored: these extracts were transcribed from the videos but the per-video URLs and timestamps were not recorded, so they cannot yet be checked against the recording. Treat them as reported rather than verified, and see our corrections policy if you believe one is wrong.

Dr Steve Watts

The National Crime Agency panel gave advice that should have caused the investigation to pause and reconsider. That advice was simply set aside. That is a serious failure of process.
Topic: On the NCA review panel whose guidance was not acted upon

Dr Steve Watts

Once you decide who the suspect is and then go looking for the evidence, you are no longer investigating — you are building a case. That is exactly what happened here.
Topic: On confirmation bias in Operation Hummingbird

Dr Steve Watts

Telling the police not to engage a statistician is extraordinary. You are deliberately excluding evidence that might undermine your case. That should not happen in a democratic justice system.
Topic: On the CPS instruction not to involve Professor Jane Hutton
police-investigation
confirmation-bias
NCA-review
expert-selection
Operation-Hummingbird
statistical-exclusion

Author / source

Independent YouTube commentator.

Summary paraphrased; quotes extracted under fair-dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). If you are the creator and wish attribution adjusted, please use the contact page.

YouTube URL pending; extract sourced from publicly circulated transcript of the video.