Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Independent commentary

Interview With Prof. Jane Hutton On Lucy Letby

Professor Jane Hutton, chair of the Royal Statistical Society's section on statistics and law, describes being recruited by Cheshire Police in March 2018 to conduct an independent statistical analysis, and then being blocked by the CPS, who instructed police not to proceed with her engagement. She explains in detail why the shift-statistics chart shown to the jury is methodologically flawed: it is constructed as a tautology, selecting events on the basis of who was present and then using presence as proof of guilt. She describes the specific statistical errors — failure to account for shift length, exclusion of non-suspicious events, failure to treat twins and triplets as correlated data — and explains why the approach repeats the mistake made in the Sally Clark case. She notes that the Royal Statistical Society submitted a formal critique to both prosecution and defence before trial, which was not acted upon.

Last updated
2 min read

Notable extracts

Extracts transcribed from the linked video, quoted under fair dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). Source links are being restored: these extracts were transcribed from the videos but the per-video URLs and timestamps were not recorded, so they cannot yet be checked against the recording. Treat them as reported rather than verified, and see our corrections policy if you believe one is wrong.

Prof. Jane Hutton

The police asked me to conduct a statistical analysis in March 2018. I was then told by the CPS, via the police, not to proceed. I have never had that happen in any other case.
Topic: On being blocked from conducting the statistical analysis

Prof. Jane Hutton

The chart is a tautology. Events were defined as suspicious partly because she was there. Then her presence at those events was used as evidence against her. You cannot do both.
Topic: On the logical circularity of the shift-statistics chart

Prof. Jane Hutton

The twins and the triplets were treated as independent events. They are not. When a family has a cluster of deaths, that is one data point, not several. This is the Sally Clark error again.
Topic: On the failure to treat correlated sibling cases correctly
statistics
shift-chart
CPS-decision
tautology
Sally-Clark
RSS-report

Author / source

Independent YouTube commentator.

Summary paraphrased; quotes extracted under fair-dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). If you are the creator and wish attribution adjusted, please use the contact page.

YouTube URL pending; extract sourced from publicly circulated transcript of the video.