Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Independent commentary

Interview With Tom Hayes On Lucy Letby And Libor

Tom Hayes, the LIBOR trader whose conviction was eventually quashed by the UK Supreme Court after years of imprisonment, speaks about the parallels between his experience and Lucy Letby's. He explains how his confession was extracted under duress during complex legal proceedings and how it was later used against him despite being unreliable. Hayes is critical of the expert witness industry, arguing that paid experts are selected and briefed precisely to reach particular conclusions, and that courts lack the means to assess whether competing expert claims are genuinely contested within the relevant scientific community. He proposes court-appointed independent experts to address the inequality of arms between prosecution and defence. Hayes is clear that the British legal system, while superficially fair, has structural features that make it prone to convicting people who lack the resources or knowledge to challenge technical evidence effectively.

Last updated
2 min read

Notable extracts

Extracts transcribed from the linked video, quoted under fair dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). Source links are being restored: these extracts were transcribed from the videos but the per-video URLs and timestamps were not recorded, so they cannot yet be checked against the recording. Treat them as reported rather than verified, and see our corrections policy if you believe one is wrong.

Tom Hayes (Speaker 1)

I confessed. And my confession was used against me for years. But a confession extracted when someone is terrified, legally isolated, and facing decades in prison is not evidence of guilt — it is evidence of fear.
Topic: On false confessions and their use in court

Tom Hayes (Speaker 1)

The expert witness industry is a business. Experts are selected because they will say what the side paying them needs them to say. The court cannot easily tell the difference between a genuine scientific consensus and a manufactured one.
Topic: On the unreliability of paid expert witness evidence

Tom Hayes (Speaker 1)

Court-appointed experts. Independent of both sides. That is the only way you can have genuine equality of arms on technical questions. Without that, money wins.
Topic: Proposing a structural reform to the expert witness system
libor-parallel
false-confessions
expert-witness-reform
inequality-of-arms
miscarriage-of-justice
court-appointed-experts

Author / source

Independent YouTube commentator.

Summary paraphrased; quotes extracted under fair-dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). If you are the creator and wish attribution adjusted, please use the contact page.

YouTube URL pending; extract sourced from publicly circulated transcript of the video.