Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Independent commentary

Lucy Letby 25 Questions For Dr. Dewi Evans

The host presents twenty-five questions that Dewi Evans has never publicly answered, using the format to expose the most significant gaps in the prosecution's scientific foundation. Questions cover Evans's failure to engage with alternative diagnoses, his letter to Channel 5 effectively disowning his Child C diagnosis after conviction, the peer review conducted by Sandie Bohin using conclusions he had already written, the selection of Bohin herself through NCA contacts, and the complete absence of genetic testing for any infant. The host notes that neonatology is a more specialised field than it appears — with fewer qualified practitioners in the UK than there are Premier League footballers — making Evans's lack of current clinical practice especially significant. He also addresses the statistical consensus against the shift rota chart, citing twelve or more statisticians who have rejected it, and Evans's apparent unfamiliarity with the correct forensic standards for insulin testing.

Last updated
2 min read

Notable extracts

Extracts transcribed from the linked video, quoted under fair dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). Source links are being restored: these extracts were transcribed from the videos but the per-video URLs and timestamps were not recorded, so they cannot yet be checked against the recording. Treat them as reported rather than verified, and see our corrections policy if you believe one is wrong.

Host (Speaker 1)

Evans wrote to Channel 5 after the conviction to say his opinion on Child C had changed. Changed. After someone is serving a full life sentence for murders he diagnosed. And no one treated this as a problem.
Topic: On Evans's post-conviction revision of his Child C diagnosis

Host (Speaker 1)

Bohin was given Evans's conclusions and asked if she agreed with them. She agreed with every single one. That is not a peer review. That is a rubber stamp.
Topic: On the inadequacy of the Bohin peer review process

Host (Speaker 1)

There are fewer qualified neonatologists in the United Kingdom than there are Premier League footballers. It is an extraordinarily specialised field. Evans has not worked clinically in nearly twenty years. This matters enormously.
Topic: On the importance of Evans's lack of current neonatal practice
dewi-evans
peer-review-failure
channel-5-letter
genetic-testing
neonatology-specialisation
bohin-review

Author / source

Independent YouTube commentator.

Summary paraphrased; quotes extracted under fair-dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). If you are the creator and wish attribution adjusted, please use the contact page.

YouTube URL pending; extract sourced from publicly circulated transcript of the video.