Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Independent commentary

Lucy Letby BBC Panorama Refuting Misleading Insulin Claims

The host provides a detailed scientific rebuttal of the insulin claims made in the BBC Panorama documentary and in the accompanying book by Judith Moritz and Jonathan Coffey. He demonstrates that the Roche Cobas immunoassay used in the case is a screening test — its own manufacturer's labelling states it is not suitable for investigating factitious hypoglycaemia — and that the United Kingdom and Ireland Association of Forensic Toxicologists explicitly requires confirmatory mass spectrometry before any immunoassay result is used in a legal setting. Neither test was carried out. He explains that thirty to sixty percent of neonates experience hypoglycaemia naturally, that the yo-yo glucose pattern attributed to poisoning is consistent with standard bolus treatment errors, and that the third insulin case — an infant with documented congenital hyperinsulinism — was never shown to the jury. He is particularly critical of Judith Moritz for failing to seek comment from any expert sceptical of the prosecution, identifying no sources, and misrepresenting what the international expert panel actually said.

Last updated
2 min read

Notable extracts

Extracts transcribed from the linked video, quoted under fair dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). Source links are being restored: these extracts were transcribed from the videos but the per-video URLs and timestamps were not recorded, so they cannot yet be checked against the recording. Treat them as reported rather than verified, and see our corrections policy if you believe one is wrong.

Host (Speaker 1)

The label on the test itself says: if exogenous insulin administration is suspected, please inform the laboratory so that the sample can be referred externally for analysis. The correct test was never done. The jury never knew that.
Topic: On the immunoassay's own labelling contra its use in the trial

Host (Speaker 1)

The United Kingdom and Ireland Association of Forensic Toxicologists is explicit: a presumptive screening test such as immunoassay must be confirmed by a different, more specific methodology. Use of a second immunoassay to confirm the first is not acceptable, even if it is more specific. None of this is in Judith's book.
Topic: On the forensic toxicology standards that were not followed

Host (Speaker 1)

There was a third infant. Documented congenital hyperinsulinism. The court never heard about it. It was briefly on the Thirwall Enquiry website and then removed. I have a copy.
Topic: On the undisclosed third insulin case
insulin-immunoassay
mass-spectrometry
congenital-hyperinsulinism
forensic-toxicology-standards
judith-moritz
bbc-panorama

Author / source

Independent YouTube commentator.

Summary paraphrased; quotes extracted under fair-dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). If you are the creator and wish attribution adjusted, please use the contact page.

YouTube URL pending; extract sourced from publicly circulated transcript of the video.