Notable extracts
Extracts transcribed from the linked video, quoted under fair dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). Source links are being restored: these extracts were transcribed from the videos but the per-video URLs and timestamps were not recorded, so they cannot yet be checked against the recording. Treat them as reported rather than verified, and see our corrections policy if you believe one is wrong.
Host (Speaker 1)
The label on the test itself says: if exogenous insulin administration is suspected, please inform the laboratory so that the sample can be referred externally for analysis. The correct test was never done. The jury never knew that.
Host (Speaker 1)
The United Kingdom and Ireland Association of Forensic Toxicologists is explicit: a presumptive screening test such as immunoassay must be confirmed by a different, more specific methodology. Use of a second immunoassay to confirm the first is not acceptable, even if it is more specific. None of this is in Judith's book.
Host (Speaker 1)
There was a third infant. Documented congenital hyperinsulinism. The court never heard about it. It was briefly on the Thirwall Enquiry website and then removed. I have a copy.