Lucy Letby ΓÇô Dr. Dewi Evans STILL Can't Keep Quiet

The host responds to comments Dewi Evans gave to The Guardian newspaper, arguing they are contradicted by the Court of Appeal document Evans himself cited in his defence. The video examines Evans's claim that the Lee and Tanswell paper was not central to his diagnosis, demonstrating that the Court of Appeal document explicitly states it featured prominently in the trial. The host then critiques Evans's assertion that he was supported by seven other experts, methodically showing that five contributed nothing to the air embolism theory, one performed an inadequate non-blind peer review, and the remaining expert subsequently contradicted Evans's mechanism. The video also critiques Evans's claim to have been in good standing with the GMC since 1971, and his deregistered status is highlighted as relevant context.

Last updated 2026-07-14

2 min read

Notable extracts

Extracts transcribed from the linked video, quoted under fair dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). Source links are being restored: these extracts were transcribed from the videos but the per-video URLs and timestamps were not recorded, so they cannot yet be checked against the recording. Treat them as reported rather than verified, and see our corrections policy if you believe one is wrong.

Speaker 1 (host)

He's trying to cite the Court of Appeal verdict as being favourable to his opinion and his views. At this point there's nothing he can say because anything he says contradicts something else that he's said or something else that he's done.

Topic: On Evans citing the Court of Appeal document

Speaker 1 (host)

Dr Evans in his statement: the Lee and Tanswell paper was not a major factor in the prosecution case. The Court of Appeal: the Lee and Tanswell paper featured prominently in the trial.

Topic: Direct contradiction between Evans's Guardian statement and Court of Appeal paragraph 15

Speaker 1 (host)

Five of them offered no support at all. One of them did an absolutely crap peer review, and one of them gave an opinion on something that Dr Evans has since said, well, actually, that didn't really happen.

Topic: Summarising the seven expert witnesses allegedly supporting Evans

Reddit commenter (NHS professional, quoted by host)

My friend plans to only work as an expert witness for five years after retiring. After that, their knowledge is just out of date. Evans retired from being a doctor in 2009.

Topic: Reddit post from retired NHS surgeon about Evans's credibility

Notable extracts

Related on this site