Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Independent commentary

Lucy Letby Miscarriage of Justice - Response to Times Article & Thirlwall Lawyers Summary

A commentary host critiques the document produced by Thirlwall Inquiry lawyers, identifying eight major weaknesses. These include a conflict of interest involving Simon Driver, excessive vague language, poor argumentation, sanctimonious tone, a case-note review described as superficial by the lawyers' own colleagues, disingenuous statements about Owen Arthurs, disparaging treatment of Professor Neena Modi, and factually inaccurate claims. The host draws parallels to wrongful conviction cases including Colin Norris, Andrew Malkinson, and the Birmingham Six, arguing that public pressure rather than institutional processes drove those exonerations. A former Birmingham Six prisoner is quoted warning that official bodies cannot be trusted to deliver justice on their own.

XBlueskyFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppRedditMastodonEmail
Last updated
2 min read

Notable extracts

Extracts transcribed from the linked video, quoted under fair dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). Source links are being restored: these extracts were transcribed from the videos but the per-video URLs and timestamps were not recorded, so they cannot yet be checked against the recording. Treat them as reported rather than verified, and see our corrections policy if you believe one is wrong.

Paddy Hill (Birmingham Six, quoted by host)

We didn't get our convictions overturned because of the government or the courts… public outcry.
Topic: On what actually drives wrongful conviction reversals

Speaker 1 (host)

The document is full of waffle. It is full of poor arguments. It is full of sanctimony. And it makes inaccurate claims about the case.
Topic: Summary assessment of Thirlwall lawyers' document

Speaker 1 (host)

Their own lawyers are describing the case note review as superficial. And yet somehow this is being used to support the conviction.
Topic: On the self-undermining nature of the Thirlwall document
thirlwall-inquiry
wrongful-conviction
institutional-failure
birmingham-six
miscarriage-of-justice

Author / source

Independent YouTube commentator.

Summary paraphrased; quotes extracted under fair-dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). If you are the creator and wish attribution adjusted, please use the contact page.

YouTube URL pending; extract sourced from publicly circulated transcript of the video.

Related on this site

Evidence issues

People

Share:XBlueskyFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppRedditMastodonEmail