Notable extracts
Extracts transcribed from the linked video, quoted under fair dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). Source links are being restored: these extracts were transcribed from the videos but the per-video URLs and timestamps were not recorded, so they cannot yet be checked against the recording. Treat them as reported rather than verified, and see our corrections policy if you believe one is wrong.
Professor Jane Hutton (quoted from ITV documentary)
The way you would approach this kind of thing is you get all of what we call the cases so that we can see that Letby was present for all of them. There is no explanation for the events that were left out, so really all this is telling us is that Letby was there for some events. This is a summary that is so crude that it can only be described as grossly misleading.
Professor Nina Modi (quoted from ITV documentary)
It's been deeply disturbing that one can have such a high profile and tremendously important trial that seems to have been conducted with so many flaws.
Helen Shannon (quoted from ITV documentary)
We've spent hundreds of hours investigating every facet of the science and there is a completely obvious solution that does not involve poisoning. Those equations don't lie.
Professor Matthew Yoll (quoted from ITV documentary)
That kind of test was never meant to put somebody in prison. You would not strip a gold medal from an international athlete on an immunoassay. It's not good enough for drug testing for pilots or anyone who has mandatory drug testing. So if it's not good enough to fire someone, how can it be good enough to put someone in prison?