Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Independent commentary

Why Aren't The Lucy Letby Court Proceedings Public Property

The host argues that court proceedings in the United Kingdom should be fully recorded and publicly available, using the Letby case as a prime example. The video covers the £100,000 fee quoted to MP Sir David Davis for court transcripts, the 1925 Criminal Justice Act prohibition on recordings, and the police's refusal to release more than a tiny fraction of Letby's 23-hour-plus police interviews. The host contrasts British opacity with American transparency, where full court proceedings for major cases are publicly available online. The elitist attitude underlying current policy is illustrated through Lord Denning's notorious 1980 comments dismissing the Birmingham Six appeal. Lord Bingham is cited as a counter-authority who explicitly identified public scrutiny as central to the rule of law.

Last updated
2 min read

Notable extracts

Extracts transcribed from the linked video, quoted under fair dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). Source links are being restored: these extracts were transcribed from the videos but the per-video URLs and timestamps were not recorded, so they cannot yet be checked against the recording. Treat them as reported rather than verified, and see our corrections policy if you believe one is wrong.

Lord Denning (quoted from court record)

This is such an appalling vista that every sensible person in the land would say it cannot be right that these actions should go any further.
Topic: Denning on the Birmingham Six appeal, 1980

Lord Bingham (quoted from The Rule of Law)

The judges are not of course the only guardians of the rule of law. Perhaps not even the most important. Parliamentary and public opinion, informed by the media, should be alert to detect and scrutinise any infringement.
Topic: Lord Bingham, The Rule of Law

Speaker 1 (host)

The only organisation institution it benefits is the police itself. I cannot see any conceivable reason, considering that the police is publicly funded, considering that the police should definitely be publicly accountable as a body and organisation, why they shouldn't be required to release full recordings of police interviews.
Topic: On withholding police interview recordings
court transparency
transcript access
police interviews
rule of law
public accountability

Author / source

Independent YouTube commentator.

Summary paraphrased; quotes extracted under fair-dealing for review and news reporting (CDPA 1988 s.30). If you are the creator and wish attribution adjusted, please use the contact page.

YouTube URL pending; extract sourced from publicly circulated transcript of the video.