Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Investigation

Police interview methodology — leading questions and PEACE-model breaches

The prosecution’s claim: Letby's police interview record was presented as evidence of guilty knowledge and inconsistent accounts.

Last updated
2 min read

Prosecution claim

Letby's police interview record was presented as evidence of guilty knowledge and inconsistent accounts.

Counter-evidence

Independent review of the police interview transcripts identifies departures from the PEACE model standards governing investigative interviewing in England and Wales. The PEACE model (Planning, Engage, Account, Closure, Evaluate) requires open-ended questioning, a non-leading approach, and the recording of the interviewee's own account before any account is suggested. Specific instances of leading questions, suggested answers, and pre-interview disclosure of investigator hypotheses have been identified across multiple interview sessions. Interview methodology problems featured prominently in the wrongful-conviction overturning of Tom Hayes (LIBOR, Supreme Court 2025), Stefan Kiszko, Stephen Downing and others; the same methodological framework applies to evaluation of the Letby interview record.

Key point: PEACE-model interviewing requires the interviewee's own account to be recorded before any hypothesis is suggested. Departures from this principle in the Letby interviews are documented and are a recognised mechanism by which apparent inconsistencies are produced.

What the jury heard

Excerpts from police interview transcripts were presented as evidence of inconsistent accounts and guilty knowledge. The PEACE-model framework against which the interview methodology should be assessed was not foregrounded.

What the Panel says

The Panel does not opine on UK police-interview procedure. The methodological framework for assessing interview reliability is well established in the wrongful-conviction literature.

What independent experts add

  • Tom Hayes's biography (/people/tom-hayes) covers comparable confession-and-interview problems in the LIBOR case.
  • PEACE-model training and standards are documented by the College of Policing.
  • Our /analysis/police-interviews-critique page covers the Letby interview record specifically.

Further reading

Source: PEACE model interview-training standards (College of Policing); independent review of Letby interview transcripts cited in CCRC submission material; comparable wrongful-conviction interview-methodology critiques