Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts

Institutional explainer

Trust executive decision-making — 2015–2016

Trust executive decisions during 2015–2016 — staffing levels, response to consultant concerns, communications with regulators, the apology-letter sequence — are documented in the Thirlwall record.

Official inquiry evidence1Court/official
Last updated

Why it matters in the Letby case

The July 2025 arrests of three former senior executives on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter are a separate investigation; no charging decisions have been announced.

Prosecution position

Executive conduct formed no part of the case against Letby and does not bear on the verdicts.

Expert challenge / post-conviction reading

The Inquiry record documents the decisions taken in 2015-2016: staffing levels, the response to consultant concerns, communications with regulators, the grievance process and the apology-letter sequence.

What remains uncertain

Three former senior executives were arrested in July 2025 on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter and one was re-arrested on 23 April 2026 on suspicion of perverting the course of justice. No charging decisions have been announced, and an arrest is not a charge.

Common questions

What decisions are in scope?

Staffing levels, the response to consultant escalation, communications with regulators, and the grievance and apology-letter sequence of autumn 2016 to spring 2017.

Have any executives been charged?

No. Three were arrested in July 2025 on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter, and one was re-arrested on 23 April 2026 on suspicion of perverting the course of justice. No charging decisions have been announced.

Does this investigation affect the convictions?

No. It is a separate investigation into institutional conduct.

What was the apology-letter sequence?

A grievance process run by the Trust's HR department between autumn 2016 and spring 2017 that ended with consultants being required to apologise to Letby for having raised patient-safety concerns.

Found an error or missing source? Send a correction with the page URL and supporting source.