Why it matters in the Letby case
Public discussion sometimes conflates 'referral', 'acquittal' and 'overturn'. They are different outcomes with different consequences.
July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.
Legal explainer
The Court of Appeal Criminal Division can quash a conviction, order a retrial, or uphold the conviction. It does not itself decide guilt or innocence in the trial sense; it decides whether the conviction is unsafe.
Public discussion sometimes conflates 'referral', 'acquittal' and 'overturn'. They are different outcomes with different consequences.
The convictions were considered and upheld by the Court of Appeal in 2024, which is the outcome that currently governs.
The post-conviction case is that new material changes what the Court would now be considering. It does not contend that the Court exceeded its powers in 2024.
Public discussion frequently conflates referral, quashing and acquittal. Each is a distinct outcome with different consequences, and none of them is a judicial finding of innocence.
Quash the conviction, order a retrial, or uphold the conviction. It does not decide guilt or innocence in the trial sense.
A referral is the CCRC sending a case to the Court. Overturning is the Court quashing the conviction. The first does not imply the second.
It does not re-weigh the evidence as a jury would. Its question is whether the conviction is unsafe.
No. The CCRC route exists precisely for cases where a direct appeal has failed and new material later emerges.
Found an error or missing source? Send a correction with the page URL and supporting source.