Why it matters in the Letby case
Private Eye coverage has been an early indicator on several developments later picked up by the broader press.
Media explainer
Private Eye M.D. column — coverage analysis
The Private Eye M.D. column, written by Dr Phil Hammond, has provided sustained coverage of the Letby case since the trial, including independent expert engagement and procedural reporting.
Media report4Mainstream news
Last updated
Prosecution position
M.D. is a column, not court reporting, and its conclusions are the author's own rather than findings of any court or inquiry.
Expert challenge / post-conviction reading
Dr Phil Hammond has written regularly about the case since 2023 and was among the first UK journalists to raise systematic questions about the medical evidence, at a point when almost no other UK mainstream outlet was doing so.
What remains uncertain
Being early is not the same as being right, and the column's specific claims stand or fall on the same evidence as everyone else's. Its value on this site is chronological: it marks when particular questions entered UK mainstream print.
Common questions
Who writes the M.D. column?
Dr Phil Hammond, a doctor and journalist, in Private Eye. He has covered the case since 2023.
Why does this site track it?
Because it was an early indicator on several developments later picked up by the broader press, which makes it useful for dating when questions entered UK mainstream print.
Is Private Eye a primary source?
No. It is commentary and investigative journalism. Under the source-reliability scale it does not carry the weight of an inquiry transcript or a judgment.
Where can I find the coverage?
Private Eye maintains a Lucy Letby special-reports page, linked from this site's Private Eye hub.
Related reading
Found an error or missing source? Send a correction with the page URL and supporting source.