Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Editorial summary (not a verbatim transcript)
·Dr John Gibbs; Thirlwall Inquiry

Dr John Gibbs — witness evidence (Thirlwall Inquiry)

Dr John Gibbs was one of the longest-serving consultant paediatricians at the Countess of Chester and a co-signatory of the September 2016 joint consultants' letter. His Thirlwall Inquiry evidence addresses the series of internal reviews conducted from late 2015 through 2016, the thematic meetings that identified Letby as the common factor, and the consultants' collective frustration at the executive response.

Last updated

Editorial summary — not a verbatim transcript.

This page is a summary written for this site. It is not a mirror of the primary document, and nothing on it should be quoted as the words of any person. An earlier version of this page carried quotations that could not be verified against the primary record; those have been removed. For the underlying record, consult the primary source at thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk. See our corrections policy.

Status: Editorial summary written for this site — not a mirrored document

Original source: thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk

Context

Dr John Gibbs, consultant paediatrician, was one of the longest-serving senior clinicians on the Countess of Chester neonatal unit during the cluster period. He co-signed the September 2016 joint letter demanding police involvement and gave extensive Thirlwall Inquiry evidence on the sequence of internal reviews that ran from late 2015 through late 2016.

The internal-review sequence

Dr Gibbs described the earliest institutional response to the cluster as a “Serious Incident Review of the first three deaths”, held around 2 July 2015 and understood to involve Dr Brearey, the Director of Nursing and risk management — though he said he did not know if it had been “reported to the right channel”. That gave way to the thematic review of neonatal mortality, held on 8 February 2016 with a doctor from the Neonatal Network, which he said “did identify some sub optimal care issues, none of them thought to be very significant” while highlighting “that there had been several — it doesn’t mention how many — unexpected, unexplained deaths”.

The hospital’s own internal review followed in July 2016: Gibbs and nurse Anne Martyn examined babies transferred out of the unit as, in his words, “a proxy for a limited type of unexpected collapse”, with findings presented to the Medical Director on 13 July. The Royal College review followed that September, and on 26 January 2017 executives told the consultants that its findings, together with Dr Hawdon’s, showed “no evidence of any wrongdoing” and that Letby was exonerated. Gibbs said: “I was too stunned to ask anything at the end of that meeting. My head was swirling.”

Read alongside

Dr Brearey, Dr Jayaram, the September 2016 letter.