Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Editorial summary (not a verbatim transcript)
·Dr Susie Holt; Thirlwall Inquiry

Dr Susie Holt — witness evidence (Thirlwall Inquiry)

Dr Susie Holt, junior doctor at the Countess of Chester during the cluster period, gave Thirlwall Inquiry evidence on the ward-floor perspective: staffing, acuity of babies being admitted, and the consultants' concerns as perceived by the trainee doctor layer.

Last updated

Editorial summary — not a verbatim transcript.

This page is a summary written for this site. It is not a mirror of the primary document, and nothing on it should be quoted as the words of any person. An earlier version of this page carried quotations that could not be verified against the primary record; those have been removed. For the underlying record, consult the primary source at thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk. See our corrections policy.

Status: Editorial summary written for this site — not a mirrored document

Original source: thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk

Context

Dr Susie Holt was a junior doctor (trainee paediatrician) at the Countess of Chester during the cluster period. Her Thirlwall Inquiry evidence captures the ward-floor perspective at the trainee-doctor layer: staffing, the acuity of admitted babies, the hand-off protocols between night and day teams, and how the consultants’ escalating concerns were understood and discussed by the wider clinical team.

What the evidence addresses

  • The routine trainee-doctor workload on the unit during 2015-2016.
  • Specific deterioration events Dr Holt was clinically involved with or witnessed handover for.
  • The trainee-level view of the Trust’s response to the consultants’ concerns — particularly whether the concerns were communicated through normal clinical-governance channels to trainee grades, or were held at consultant level.
  • The hand-off practices between shifts and the way notes were written at the time, which bears on the evidential weight of the contemporaneous clinical record vs. the retrospective reconstructions at trial.

Why this evidence matters

The trainee-doctor layer is the clinical grade closest to the day-to-day patient contact below the consultant level. Trainee evidence at Thirlwall is load-bearing on the question of what the unit culture was like at the floor level — as distinct from what the executive team was told or what the consultant team was identifying. If the unit was, as multiple witnesses have now described, operating under significant staffing and acuity-mismatch strain, the trainee perspective is the first-hand evidence of that.

Read alongside

Dr Brearey, Dr Jayaram, Eirian Powell (Ward Manager), Unit conditions, A unit out of its depth.