Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Editorial summary (not a verbatim transcript)
·Dr Nim Subhedar; Thirlwall Inquiry

Dr Nim Subhedar — external review and Thirlwall evidence

Dr Nim Subhedar, consultant neonatologist at Liverpool Women's Hospital, was one of the senior external reviewers involved in assessing the Countess of Chester neonatal cluster. His Thirlwall Inquiry evidence addresses what was known to external reviewers at the time, what additional investigations he recommended, and what happened to those recommendations.

Last updated

Editorial summary — not a verbatim transcript.

This page is a summary written for this site. It is not a mirror of the primary document, and nothing on it should be quoted as the words of any person. An earlier version of this page carried quotations that could not be verified against the primary record; those have been removed. For the underlying record, consult the primary source at thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk. See our corrections policy.

Status: Editorial summary written for this site — not a mirrored document

Original source: thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk

Context

Dr Nim Subhedar is a consultant neonatologist at Liverpool Women’s Hospital — the regional tertiary referral centre that would normally have received babies too sick for the Countess of Chester’s Level 2 unit. He was among the senior external clinicians involved in reviewing the Countess of Chester cluster. His Thirlwall Inquiry evidence is weight-bearing because, as a practising tertiary-centre neonatologist, he was the kind of external reviewer best placed to see what the unit was actually doing wrong.

Key ground

Read alongside

RCPCH review authors, Unit conditions evidence page.