Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Convicted
Attempted murder (insulin) — convicted (2023)

Child F

The prosecution’s theory: Exogenous insulin added to TPN bag.

Outcome: Survived

Gestation: Twin 2, male; 29+5 weeks, 1.434 kg, borderline IUGR

Sensitivity note: court-imposed lifelong anonymity covers every family. We use the court-assigned code only. See our families and witnesses sensitivity policy.

Verdict: Guilty, unanimousCourt finding1Court/official

Prosecution theory

Exogenous insulin added to TPN bag.

Method alleged: Addition of exogenous insulin to a TPN (total parenteral nutrition) bag.

Prosecution experts: Prof. Peter Hindmarsh (UCL / Great Ormond Street). Supporting biochemists from Royal Liverpool clinical biochemistry laboratory.

Panel view (Feb 2025)

Panel: prolonged hypoglycaemia caused by sepsis, prematurity, IUGR, loss of intravenous glucose from a tissued line, and poor medical management. The insulin and C-peptide results do not prove exogenous insulin and are within the norm for preterm infants.

Pathology

At trial the Crown relied on a laboratory result for Baby F of insulin 4,657 pmol/L with a C-peptide of 169 pmol/L, presented as diagnostic of exogenous insulin. No fatal outcome. Panel conclusion: Baby 6 had prolonged hypoglycaemia because of sepsis, prematurity, borderline intrauterine growth restriction, lack of intravenous glucose when the long line infiltrated for several hours, and poor medical management of the hypoglycaemia; and his insulin level and insulin/C-peptide ratio do not prove that exogenous insulin was used, being within the norm for preterm infants. The Panel directly contradicts two prosecution premises: the blood sugar did not rise from 1.3 to 2.4 when the dextrose infusion stopped between 1000 and 1200 (it was 1.4 at 1146; the 2.4 was measured after 1200, once the drip was restarted), and the sugar rose after 1900 not because the infusion bag was changed but because the dextrose was increased to 15%. Because bags were prepared in pharmacy and stored on the unit, multiple bags would have had to be contaminated. The Panel also notes the C-peptide was not low for a preterm infant (20th–45th percentile), potassium was normal (insulin lowers potassium), and insulin autoantibodies — common in preterm infants — bind insulin and raise measured levels. On the C-peptide specifically, the Panel notes it was not low for a preterm infant (20th–45th percentile) — adult reference ranges do not apply.

Natural-cause alternatives identified

  • Sepsis, prematurity and borderline IUGR causing hypoglycaemia — the Panel's stated cause
  • Loss of intravenous glucose when the long line tissued for several hours
  • Poor management of hypoglycaemia (repeat 10% dextrose boluses cause yo-yo insulin/glucose surges)
  • Insulin autoantibodies and immunoassay interference producing falsely elevated insulin readings

What the jury did not hear

  • That the blood sugar did not, as alleged, rise while the dextrose infusion was stopped — it was 1.4 at 1146, and the 2.4 reading came after the drip restarted.
  • That the sugar rose after 1900 because the dextrose was increased to 15%, not because the infusion bag was changed.
  • That multiple pharmacy-prepared bags would have had to be contaminated for the allegation to hold.
  • That the C-peptide was not low for a preterm infant and potassium was normal — both inconsistent with exogenous insulin.
  • That insulin autoantibodies, common in preterm infants, bind insulin and inflate measured levels on immunoassay.

Key primary sources

  • International Expert Panel — Summary Report (February 2025), Panel Baby 6: https://lucyletbyinnocence.com/shoo-lee/International%20Expert%20Panel%20-%20Summary%20Report.pdf
  • R v Letby sentencing remarks (August 2023)
  • Joint Expert Witness Insulin Report on Babies F and L (May 2025)
  • science4justice.nl — 'The insulin question' parts 1 and 2 (October 2023)

Read the full long-form analysis →

Last updated

Sources:

This page uses only the court-assigned code and publicly reported facts. The court imposed lifelong anonymity on every family; this site does not contact families and does not speculate about private circumstances.