Gill critique of O'Quigley paper — roster chart 'should not have been shown to jurors'
Prof. Richard Gill publishes a formal critique (arXiv) of Prof. John O'Quigley's December 2025 roster-chart paper, identifying what he describes as serious errors in its statistical modelling — while 'strongly agree[ing]' with O'Quigley that, from a forensic statistical point of view, the roster chart is 'fake evidence which should not have been shown to jurors'. The independent statisticians dispute the modelling details but agree the chart should never have gone before the jury.
Source: arXiv:2606.29394, 28 June 2026
Covered in the latest-developments digest
The same thread
The nearest events this site records in the same category (new evidence). This site records 21 events in 2026.
- Peer-reviewed insulin research — 'impossible' readings 'effectively quite common'29 April 2026
- Prof. Richard Gill publishes 'There to care; not to kill' preprint8 May 2026
- Letby's 2016 grievance report published — complaint against consultants upheld1 June 2026
- Defence hand-delivers 'fresh evidence' reports to the CCRC2 April 2025
- New 100-page insulin report sent to the CCRC challenges Hindmarsh trial evidence9 July 2026