Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Editorial summary (not a verbatim transcript)
·Karen Townsend; Thirlwall Inquiry

Karen Townsend — HR Business Partner (Thirlwall Inquiry)

Karen Townsend, HR Business Partner at the Countess of Chester, managed the day-to-day of the grievance process Letby filed against the consultants. Her Thirlwall Inquiry evidence documents the HR mechanics of the 'apology letter' sequence.

Last updated

Editorial summary — not a verbatim transcript.

This page is a summary written for this site. It is not a mirror of the primary document, and nothing on it should be quoted as the words of any person. An earlier version of this page carried quotations that could not be verified against the primary record; those have been removed. For the underlying record, consult the primary source at thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk. See our corrections policy.

Status: Editorial summary written for this site — not a mirrored document

Original source: thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk

Context

Karen Townsend, HR Business Partner at the Countess of Chester, managed the day-to-day of the grievance process Letby filed against the consultants who raised concerns about her. Her Thirlwall Inquiry evidence documents the HR mechanics of the “apology letter” sequence in specific detail.

Key ground

Ms Townsend, Divisional Director of Urgent Care responsible for the neonatal unit from September 2015, said she first learned of increased mortality from Women and Children’s Care Governance Board minutes of 18 December 2015, without seeing the underlying report, and did not raise it with Dr Brearey or Dr Jayaram. Asked why she had not asked them what was happening, she agreed it “was a gap and a failing on my point”. She said she did not become aware that a thematic review had taken place, or that Dr Jayaram suspected a staff member, until minutes of a 16 June 2016 meeting reached her board in July.

Read alongside

Sue Hodkinson, Dr Newby (on the receiving end of the apology-letter requirement).