Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Editorial summary (not a verbatim transcript)
2023·Lorenzo Mansutti; R v Letby (defence witness)

Lorenzo Mansutti — defence witness (plumber, Countess of Chester)

Lorenzo Mansutti, a plumber who had worked at the Countess of Chester Hospital, was called by the defence at the original trial to testify about the documented sewage and plumbing failures on the neonatal unit in 2015–16. His testimony establishes that the unit had ongoing infrastructure problems routinely associated with infection risk.

Last updated

Editorial summary — not a verbatim transcript.

This page is a summary written for this site. It is not a mirror of the primary document, and nothing on it should be quoted as the words of any person. An earlier version of this page carried quotations that could not be verified against the primary record; those have been removed. For the underlying record, consult the primary source at lucyletbyinnocence.com. See our corrections policy.

Status: Editorial summary written for this site — not a mirrored document

Original source: lucyletbyinnocence.com

Context

Lorenzo Mansutti, a plumber who had worked at the Countess of Chester Hospital, was called by the defence at the original trial to testify about the documented plumbing and sewage failures on the neonatal unit during 2015–2016. He is one of the few witnesses whose evidence specifically addresses the infrastructure context around the cluster.

What he told the jury

Mr Mansutti gave evidence about specific incidents of sewage back-up on the unit, recurring plumbing failures, and the pattern of call-outs he had attended during the cluster period. His evidence establishes that the unit had ongoing infrastructure problems of the kind routinely associated with infection and environmental contamination risk — a context that the prosecution’s narrative largely did not address.

Why this matters

The Panel’s case-by-case medical review concludes every deterioration is explicable by natural causes or sub-optimal clinical care. “Sub-optimal clinical care” on a unit with documented sewage and plumbing failures is not an abstract category — it is what Mr Mansutti’s evidence describes in detail. See our evidence page on unit conditions and the new sewage-and-plumbing evidence page.