Skip to content

July 2026: Government declines to widen the Thirlwall terms of reference (16 July) · new 100-page insulin report to the CCRC challenging the trial evidence (9 July) · Thirlwall report still expected no earlier than September · inquests relisted to 2027 · Shoo Lee Panel: no medical evidence of deliberate harm.

Lucy Letby Facts
Editorial summary (not a verbatim transcript)
·Dr Murthy Saladi; Thirlwall Inquiry

Dr Murthy Saladi — witness evidence (Thirlwall Inquiry)

Dr Murthy Saladi, consultant paediatrician, was one of the September 2016 letter's signatories. His Thirlwall Inquiry evidence addresses the pattern of deterioration on the unit, the executive response to the consultants' concerns, and his own view on why the delay in contacting police mattered.

Last updated

Editorial summary — not a verbatim transcript.

This page is a summary written for this site. It is not a mirror of the primary document, and nothing on it should be quoted as the words of any person. An earlier version of this page carried quotations that could not be verified against the primary record; those have been removed. For the underlying record, consult the primary source at thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk. See our corrections policy.

Status: Editorial summary written for this site — not a mirrored document

Original source: thirlwall.public-inquiry.uk

Context

Dr Murthy Saladi, consultant paediatrician, was among the signatories of the September 2016 joint letter demanding police involvement. His Thirlwall Inquiry evidence is one of the collective record of consultant voices warning Trust management about the cluster of deaths.

Key ground

Dr Saladi described relationships between consultants, junior doctors and nurses at the Countess as good throughout 2015-17, though he said the consultant body was under strain because “we were understaffed and we were having busy periods and during that time there were more unwell children”. He had little direct contact with senior management, raising concerns instead through Dr Jayaram and Dr Brearey. By late June 2016 he had come to think the cluster needed external scrutiny: in an email to colleagues he wrote that “one of the teams who can deal with suspicion is the police because we are not good with dealing with suspicion”.

When Mr Harvey emailed the consultants that action was being taken and “All emails cease forthwith”, Dr Saladi recalled senior managers explaining that, because the dispute was “coming across as doctors versus nurses”, an independent body including the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health would be brought in before any decision on the police. He gave evidence to the Coroner at Child A’s inquest on 10 October 2016 without telling the Coroner about the wider concerns he and his colleagues held by then that deliberate harm might be responsible.

Read alongside

The September 2016 letter, Dr Gibbs, Dr Newby.