Commons debate on the Thirlwall Inquiry's terms of reference — Government declines to widen them
In an adjournment debate in the House of Commons, Sir David Davis MP argues that the Thirlwall Inquiry is asking too narrow a set of questions, telling the House that the neonatal unit was operating '30% to 40% below the staffing levels recommended by the British Association of Perinatal Medicine' and that 'at least 14 babies either had an infection or were suspected to have an infection'. Aphra Brandreth MP also speaks. Replying for the Government, health minister Preet Kaur Gill declines to widen the terms of reference: 'the point of the inquiry is not to rehearse Lucy Letby's trial; it is to focus on how people within the trust responded.' She restates that it is not for the Government to comment on or intervene in individual CCRC applications.
Source: Hansard, House of Commons, 16 July 2026; The Telegraph, 16 July 2026
Covered in the latest-developments digest
The same thread
The nearest events this site records in the same category (legal milestone). This site records 26 events in 2026.
- CCRC head of investigations steps down from the Letby review25 March 2026
- Thirlwall Inquiry issues April update on final-report progress21 April 2026
- 'Reasonable Doubt: Examining the Case of Lucy Letby' published9 July 2026
- CPS upholds its decision not to bring further charges — a final decision5 August 2026
- Thirlwall Inquiry publishes a further tranche of documents5 August 2026
- Death reported of Dr Mark Deakin, who gave evidence at trial and at the Inquiry10 August 2026